Monday, 19 March 2012

New Details Emerge of a New Details Emerge of a Chinese Leader’s Removal

BEIJING — Communist Party leaders sacked Bo Xilai, the powerful party chief of metropolitan Chongqing, after being told that he had schemed to remove his police chief and impede a corruption investigation involving his family, according to a preliminary report on Mr. Bo’s actions circulated among government officials.
A leaked version of the report provides the first detailed look at events that have unleashed a political earthquake in China’s leadership ranks as officials prepare for a transfer of power to a new generation of party leaders.       
And it states for the first time that the Chongqing police chief who triggered that earthquake — Mr. Bo’s trusted aide, Wang Lijun — had sought political asylum when he fled to at a United States consulate to escape Mr. Bo’s wrath.
The Communist Party Central Committee circulated the findings on Friday, one day after the announcement of Mr. Bo’s dismissal, and a transcript quickly was leaked online. Its contents were confirmed by a researcher at a ministry-level government institute and by a Chongqing official briefed by colleagues who were present when the report was read at a government meeting.
Combined with other actions in recent days, the government’s decision to begin making its case against Mr. Bo suggests a campaign to discredit him. Mr. Bo, a broadly popular but highly controversial politician whose father was one of China’s revolutionary-era leaders, was openly seeking a spot in China’s top leadership when power changes hands late this year.
It also raises the prospect that Mr. Bo could face criminal charges, a rarity for an official of his rank. The party secretaries of Beijing and Shanghai, province-level cities like Chongqing, were dismissed in 1995 and 2006 and later were imprisoned for corruption. Like Mr. Bo, both were also members of the Politburo, the 25-member body that oversees Communist Party affairs.
Both of those firings, like Mr. Bo’s, were principally viewed as the fallout from power struggles within the leadership. But a number of political analysts say they regard Mr. Bo’s dismissal as potentially more serious because it involves more than a struggle for control.
“It’s not about political lines,” said Zheng Yongnian, who directs the East Asia Institute at the National University of Singapore. “It’s about whether to reform or not reform.”
The decision itself to oust Mr. Bo in the midst of a once-in-a-decade change of rulers underscores the gravity with which China’s leaders view both his political influence and the controversy surrounding him.
After decades in which leaders were handpicked by predecessors, this year’s leadership change is the first in China’s Communist history that is following rules — albeit rules known mostly only by China’s leaders. Ensuring a stable transition has become a party obsession.
“If he is dislodged and this purge sticks, then the transition can move forward smoothly,” Andrew J. Nathan, an expert on China’s elite leaders at Columbia University, said of Mr. Bo. Yet “they have paid a huge price by firing him.”
“They have had to do exactly the thing that they hate him for doing,” he added, “which is to shred the facade of party unity. And they would have preferred not to.”
Mr. Bo, 62, has built a national reputation on his charisma — a sharp contrast to the rest of China’s interchangeably bland leadership — and on his stewardship of Chongqing, where he marshaled the government to purge officials and private entrepreneurs accused of organized crime, redistribute wealth and launch a massive drive to urbanize and house rural migrants.
His statist policies and promotion of a retro-Maoist culture in which citizens sang patriotic songs and dressed in red made him a darling of China’s political left and a serious contender for a seat on the Politburo’s Standing Committee, whose nine members enjoy uncontested authority over government policy.
But that same personality and political bent were said to nettle President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao, who appeared to resent his mixing of state power over the economy and society with the promotion of his personal and political interests. Some in the elite also frowned on Mr. Bo’s crowd-courting, almost Western, style of politicking.
Mr. Bo’s rise came to an abrupt end on Feb. 6, after his longtime aide and Chongqing’s vice mayor, Wang Lijun, fled the city and sought refuge overnight at the United States consulate in Chengdu, in Sichuan Province. Mr. Wang left the American consulate after about a next day and was taken by Chinese security officials to Beijing for interrogation.       
The version of the party’s six-point report circulated on Friday purports to explain why Mr. Wang fled to the consulate and how the party contained the damage. In essence, it states that Mr. Wang left Chongqing because he feared for his safety after telling Mr. Bo that his family was under criminal investigation.
The party investigation’s “preliminary findings” state that Mr. Wang, whose portfolio included Chongqing’s security apparatus, told Mr. Bo on Jan. 28 about “important cases related to the Bo family.” Mr. Wang told him that some investigators on the cases had felt pressured and sought to resign.
“Comrade Bo was very unhappy about this,” the leaked transcript states. Within days, he arranged for Mr. Wang to be removed as police chief and demoted to a lesser role supervising education and science, without seeking the approval of the Ministry of Public Security, the document adds, “as rules dictated.”
The report does not address why Mr. Wang, a subordinate of Mr. Bo’s, would have sought to pursue his own corruption investigation against his boss. Corruption inquiries against a leader of the rank of Mr. Bo would normally be conducted by investigators under the direct authority of the party elite in Beijing, not by a provincial official.
According to the report, after Chongqing party authorities announced the move to local police on Feb. 2, investigations were initiated of Mr. Wang’s aides and the investigators of the cases against the Bo family, under pressure from Bo Xilai’s family members and people who worked by Mr. Bo’s side.
“Wang Lijun felt that his own personal safety was under threat. He then decided to leave.”
The document states that Mr. Wang filed a formal request for political asylum with American consular officials after discussing “matters related to cooperation and exchange,” but does not elaborate.
Rumors have been rife — and unverified — that Mr. Wang presented American officials with evidence of official corruption, and that he dispatched more evidence outside China for release in the event that someone should seek to harm him.
Both those rumors and the party’s findings underscore the unusual degree to which reports of corruption dog the Chinese elite, and color citizens’ view of their leaders. Few complaints about the government are as widely shared, and few seem as resistant to solution as the issue of graft.
In Mr. Bo’s case, however, corruption may be part of a broader effort by Mr. Bo’s rivals in the party leadership to sully his reputation as a populist Robin Hood who wielded his power to better the lot of Chongqing’s poor multitudes.
On Friday, Mr. Hu’s ally and heir apparent, vice president Xi Jinping, published an essay in a Communist Party journal calling for more discipline in the party’s ranks and criticizes those who “play to the crowd” or use their positions to gain fame or wealth.
Like Mr. Wen’s remarks at a news conference last week warning against radical policies that could trigger another Cultural Revolution, Mr. Xi’s article was largely interpreted as a swipe at Mr. Bo’s flamboyant rule.
Even so, Mr. Bo’s popularity and clout makes disposing of his case an “extremely dangerous” matter for party leaders, said Cheng Li, a scholar of the Chinese leadership at the Brookings Institution in Washington.
“If the charge is too lenient, some senior leaders and all liberal intellectuals will not agree,” he said. “If they only charge him with corruption, that will make him a hero among many people because the general perception is that corruption is a widespread phenomenon — so why are you singling him out?”

Sunday, 18 March 2012

Brussels mosque arsonist charged


BRUSSELS - A man suspected of setting fire to a Brussels mosque, killing an imam, has been charged with a terrorism offence, Belgium’s Belga news agency reported Saturday, quoting prosecutors. The man had originally been charged with causing death by arson, with the aggravating factor that the attack was religiously inspired. An additional charge of committing a terrorist offence had been added Friday, based on what the suspect had said during his interrogations, Belga quoted prosecution spokesman Jean-Marc Meilleur as saying. Meilleur said Tuesday, the day after the attack the man told investigators he had sought to “scare” the Shiite community, which he held responsible for Syria’s crackdown on dissent.
Under questioning the man said “he was shocked by the pictures of what was going on in Syria and wanted to do something to scare members of the community which was responsible” for the violence, Meilleur told the press.
The man told investigators he had acted alone and decided to carry out the attack two weeks ago but had had no intention to kill

Prime ministers and peons

Last week, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani informed the nation that he was the “Prime Minster and not a peon.” While nobody has any confusion about which of the two offices he holds, he made this statement to justify his defiance of the Supreme Court's order asking him to write the much-delayed letter to Swiss authorities. Though he is going around these days giving various frivolous reasons for not writing the letter, this unconstitutional assertion of his prime ministerial weight is especially shameful for a number of reasons and it militates against the very essence of democracy. After all, prime ministers and peons are both bound to follow the orders of the Supreme Court. In fact, a prime minister has a bigger responsibility to uphold the rule of law and to conduct himself, according to the Constitution. Besides, prime ministers and peons are not lords and serfs, and the Prime Minister must learn to make that distinction.
Instead of respecting the constitutional mandate of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution, the Prime Minister has stubbornly insisted on interpreting it himself. He has offered no explanation for this unwarranted expansion of his role as the Chief Executive. Perhaps, he thinks that a prime minister is the same thing as a monarch or a feudal lord whose word is law, and that the powers vested in a prime minister are defined not by what is written in the Constitution, but by his whims and fancies. So, having thus assumed the powers not only to run the government as he pleases, but also to interpret the Constitution as he pleases, he is going around misleading people and promoting lawlessness in the country.
According to his interpretation, tainted by fear and favour and a big dose of loyalty, the Supreme Court's order about writing to Swiss authorities is against the Constitution. He says that he will be going against constitutional provisions regarding presidential immunity, if he writes the letter that could revive litigation involving President Asif Zardari. Does he think that the honourable judges have not read what the Constitution says about presidential immunity? And why has this point, that is so vociferously argued in the media and public meetings by the Prime Minister and his loyal yes-men and yes-women, never been raised before the court by his legal team? Even in the ongoing contempt proceedings against the Prime Minister, his counsel refused to address the issue, even when asked by the court. While most of the comments on his recent statements have explored the political compulsions and expediencies behind the Prime Minister's refusal to write the letter, the problem does not end there!
If we analyse further his statement declaring that he is a “Prime Minister and not a peon”, it is not difficult to decipher the mindset of the Prime Minister and his partymen engaged in this unscrupulous clever-by-half politics. Having suggested that the Supreme Court order is against the Constitution, the Prime Minister's statement conveyed the message that peons must follow orders, right or wrong, without asking questions. It is actually serfs and slaves, who are supposed to do that. A peon is paid salary for performing certain duties and he is not bound to follow orders that do not fall within the ambit of his duty. For people like Prime Minister Gilani weaned on feudal privileges, the difference between a peon and a serf is, of course, a very difficult distinction to make, or one that they refuse to make even when they are elevated from their feudal settings to be inducted in constitutional offices. The sooner we rid democracy of such feudal baggage that treats public servants as unquestioning serfs, the better.
It is the same mindset that views authority vested in constitutional offices as a personal privilege and a tool for patronising family, friends and loyal partymen, a mindset that views assets of the state as personal jagirs. In this hierarchical order, the name of the game is ‘loyalty’ and not the ‘rule of law’. There are different rules for different people depending on their status and it is very important to understand your place in the scheme of things. The person at the top of the heap is always right and there are no fundamental rights. To improve one's station in life, one must carry out the orders of the lord, right or wrong, convince him of one's loyalty, and seek his generosity with arms folded behind the back, head tilted towards the ground and a sheepish look in the eye. The most interesting part is that those lording over their serfs are quick to act like serfs when the situation so demands.
Take the case of our Prime Minister who has declared that he is not a peon. His loyalty to President Zardari is clearly the force that has driven him to interpret the Constitution in his convoluted unprincipled way. He has chosen to flout his constitutional obligations in order to obey the orders, right or wrong, of someone he considers responsible for elevating him to the position that he likes to throw around as a licence of unbridled authority. He understands his place in Zardari's PPP, and looks up to the PPP-lord, hopeful of the generosity that will be showered upon him for his undying loyalty. A lord in his constituency, he understands that in the PPP-darbar he is a serf. The problem is not that as Prime Minister he feels that he should not be ordered around. The problem is that the Supreme Court does not fit into his feudal hierarchy that ends at the person of President Zardari.
So while this feudal circus gets more and more obscene in the so-called democratic corridors of power, the nation pays a heavy price to keep democracy alive. Government structures are shamelessly used as chequered boards to play feudal power games of privilege and patronage. Political parties that espouse democracy for the nation, operate like feudal estates complete with lords and vows of loyalty to them. State institutions that refuse to become a part of this gory drama of deception and greed are maligned and pushed against the wall. The Constitution is a heap of words to be used, abused and amended as and when required. And people of Pakistan, in whose name these revolting games are played, figure nowhere in the picture. The nation is expected to stand in a circle around the circus and clap, feeling good about being a democracy. If only our champions of democracy could see beyond their games, they'd see that there are only a few serfs who are clapping half-heartedly. And the peons are not amused.
n The writer is a freelance columnist.
Email: hazirjalees@hotmail.com

MQM, ANP join hands to turn Karachi arms-free

The Mohajir Qaumi Movement (haqiqi) and Awami National Party on Sunday announced to rid Karachi of the menace of weapons by taking all other political and religious parties on board. The decision was taken during a meeting of MQM (H) chairman aAfaq Ahmed and Zahid Khan spokesman of ANP and ANP Sindh chapter president Shahi Syed here in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa House. Both sides took stock of Karachi situation and observed that peace in the area had been taken hostage by a single party. They resolved that confidence of the investors could be restored only if Karachi was made free from all kinds of weapons. Shahid Syed, on the occasion, dispelled any rifts among the Urdu and Pashtu speaking communities and said that they were fighting against a particular mafia group and denounced elements creating linguistic divide. The MQM was heading the same mafia who had also threatened the journalistic community for bringing forth facts over the situation. He demanded that military cooperation should be sought for preparation of census and electoral lists.

Asia Cup: Kohli's 183 helps India beat Pakistan by 6 wkts


Virat Kohli smashed magnificent 183 as India stayed in contention of the Asia Cup final berth as they crushed arch-rivals Pakistan by six wickets at Shere Bangla National Stadium in Mirpur on Sunday. If Bangladesh beat Sri Lanka on Tuesday, then the hosts will go through to the final. India chased down the 330-run victory target in 47.5 overs to register their highest successful run chase ever. Kohli's magnificent 183 came off 148 balls and was studded with a six and 22 fours. Kohli fell when he edged a Umar Gul delivery high up in the air for Mohammad Hafeez to take the catch at point. Rohit Sharma hit a six and 5 fours in his 83-ball 68 before Umar Gul had him caught by Shahid Afridi at deep mid-wicket.

Thirty-one extortionists arrested in Karachi, says Malik

KARACHI: Interior Minister Rehman Malik said on Sunday that the police has arrested 31 people arrested in extortion in Karachi, DawnNews reported.
Extortion has been taking place since 15 years, however, the situation has been improving since the government took strict measures, Malik stated.
The minister also met with Chief Minister of Sindh, Syed Qaim Ali Shah and discussed with him the issue of extortion in Karachi.
Talking to the media after the meeting, Malik said that target killings in Karachi have been stopped but the extortion problem is still continuing.
Qaim Ali Shah also said that Karachi’s situation is improving and further stated that MQM is an ally of the government and will together participate in the next elections.

Asia Cup: Pakistan vs India



India defeated Pakistan by six wickets in the Asia Cup one-day tournament in Dhaka on Sunday.

Virat Kohli smashed a 148-ball 183 as India achieved the stiff 330-run target with 13 balls to spare in the day-night match, the first between the two teams since the World Cup semi-final at Mohali last March.

Nasir Jamshed (112) and Mohammad Hafeez (105) earlier hit centuries as Pakistan scored a challenging 329-6 after electing to bat.
Pakistan's Mohammad Hafeez (L) plays a shot as Indian captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni (R) reacts during the one day international (ODI) Asia Cup cricket match between India and Pakistan at The Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium in Dhaka. – AFP Photo.